Olympus E-P1 felt hands to play - 1 (In fact, this is a digital camera as well as the curse of the love story)

I think all photographers players, after the release of the camera, the media site evaluation, the discussion between the players, and even their own to play, probably on E-P1 almost understand. And we have been reporting a lot of space, if you want to study, and can refer to this article. This is why in my article, the data is not an objective standard. I got the main speaker of the moment, playing under a bit of my feelings.

Deliberately avoided the personal identity of the media in the past, with players ranked together, so until 4:00 p.m. 5:00 fast time, have a chance to run into the camera (if the media is in the player until there is sufficient time to find to the camera). I have the time to play, a total of not more than five minutes. So some things may not quite sure.

But no matter what, this I would like to I point of view, from my photography course, to structure a buy why EP-1, and why would hesitate to provide interest, or even friends are not interested in the views. Photography players will eventually be out of a own road

To talk about as a result of personal feelings is more subjective, and some people may be in favor of what I have said, there are likely to object to what I said. But no matter what, I would like to by this feeling, try to position the camera to be hoped that the articles of personal interest to the friends you want to buy some reference value. Therefore, let me say I like the premise of photographic views.

Dafan play to a certain degree photography for photography has its own set of views. Some people attach importance to image quality, and some people attach importance to the operation function interface, and some people attach importance to the volume, also derived from a variety of different players, accustomed to using different brands of digital cameras. In which the individual has to play itself in the end, it would be more emphasis on volume, then the function is to operate, and the final is image quality.

More than words and, in fact, implies two meanings:

First, the individual is a wide-angle users. Emphasis on volume and operating performance, usually followed with Snap shot of a class. This is with professional models, you want to produce good quality photos, is not the same as thinking.

Second, the hands will not be only one camera. After all, players, and it should not only attach importance to the camera with the film. Depending on different occasions to different cameras out, so there will always be demand for the purchase of a variety of models. However, some demand will become more frequent. Mainly as the last will.

Only on changes in the individual final is customary with small cameras, with a wider lens to take some things in life. Therefore, the camera in the traditional era, the final choice of individuals is Contax T3.

In size and image quality, even on the camera model, Comtax T3 considerable personal satisfaction (although 28mm is not really a pity, but 35mm is also OK). However, in operation, some individuals are not satisfied with the, although the function is still good, but interface is not used then shun.

So, my point of view photography SLR gradually formed, the power consumption of the machine, as well as fun or a small camera-based. (Occasionally still use the four-frame line lens LOMO, or pure manual Nikon FM2)

Choose to change

Some of the needs of the digital camera era, it has changed. About the function of the requirements early addition to my own SLR camera, a digital camera is to use the Olympus C700. Then saved some money, part of SLR is bought S2Pro. Mentioned before, however, play in the end, or the size of individual attention, so I really appreciate the life drivers, I have bought a U10 a, U20 four. Although the Sony U20s LCD display is very poor, but for me at the time LCD viewfinder only way, there is no difference. But CCD incident is ……, S2Pro me. Later bought a D70s (strictly speaking not a matter of fact I spent the money XD). C-700 is also retired, at a later time, the Advanced C consumption machine licenses bought G3. Melody of the A200 and other consumer machines have been selected the Casio P600. There are others you should be, but as time past, some have forgotten.

I think I was the driver, as well as life S2Pro broken curse this matter, and only later D70s (in fact too bad D70s) is also OK, the use of other digital cameras tend to have a feeling. In fact, a broken life after the driver a few years, individuals have continued to test a digital camera, handle many types of digital cameras, in fact, I was most exciting is that Canons S60, the time was early, there is the impulse to buy . But just because there was no money, coupled with the S series has been deliberately outside without a flash will not start (did not expect after the S80, there will be no further out, only the G and A series continues to run).

In fact, I bought a digital camera, but also not less. However, there is not a broken-off (but if I buy for others, then OK). I seriously doubt that is God does not allow me to buy a digital camera XD.

Different from the traditional and the figures

However, in between the traditional and the figures, some habits are changed. For example, in the traditional camera, select a small volume of consumption of a good machine, with the SLR image quality will not be a big gap. In addition, functional operation, apart from the interface may be not used to simplify the comparison, the press of the shutter time to get photos, it would not. Therefore, traditional camera, the fact is that you choose shape, size and lens focal length, the other on the better.

However, such circumstances to have a change in the digital age.

Consumption no matter what you drive, no matter how expensive, with more than a good lens. SLR consumer machine and the image quality is a degree of difference. The most important thing is focusing speed and shutter delay is consumer machines can not compare with the single-lens reflex (much better). In addition, the small size of the digital cameras disappeared and been replaced by thin models. So the idea for the camera, it becomes is an SLR, another is the small size, but very comprehensive models. Of course, no one is able to play big money. Second, is the A200 and P600, or the size for me too, and the volume to a certain extent, might as well get out SLR.

But has been elected to the hearts of hard to want. Frankly speaking, you get used to the SLR in operation, and then back to adapt to fool the so-called machine, in fact, is very painful. In order to fool machines seem to be very simple, small buttons, and some are on the menu. Therefore, in operation, may be very logical, it does not mean easy to use. Here, I would appreciate the music of the United States, the representative of the most specific in the end is a mirror of the A1, A2, button function as much as a fairly astonishing, to say the complexity of right, not really a special study will not use. I think this is why the A200 was the reason there will be a significant simplification. Because you are useless as long as some time, it is easy to forget that some features of the XD.

And in previous years the development of cameras, it is really a fool, and only occasional consumption can be a pre-aperture models. Speaking of this, there is a consumer machine PASM,, I was most impressed by is the Canon A80, was very clear in mind, asking price 10005 1000 9 100 (Konica fact the F200 is a very profound impression on you , but I forgot how much the price XD). It now appears, of course, very expensive, but at the time that you want to learn photography-related, there is a complete function of a digital camera, price or have a number of 20,000.

Of course, now thriving, such as Olympus was the C700, 10 optical zoom, high-power telescope crown, but also there are no other companies come in competition. Have been 20 times now, and almost all manufacturers have to do. Many a fool consumer models, but also have more advanced features.

But as I said before, I am unlikely to choose the size of the models is too large. So as the G Series C license on such a level did not consider. As a result, since the life out of the driver, disappeared after a long period of time, we rely onD70s. I started looking for the function of the small size of the entire trip to the camera.

Able in the digital age, to find salvation?

Not to say trivial process, and the GX-100 has been the emergence, in fact, I know it is what I want. Of course, the fact he has many deficiencies. Than in traditional times I used a small camera to shoot up fast enough (this can only save with the pan-confocal mode), the dark-focus people shed tears, image quality and the number of single-drop too much.

General assessment for the camera, image quality is very easy to quantify. However, the size of the operation or very difficult to have a unified interface objective criteria. You can not say that the size difference of the number of sub-5mm off, or this kind of operation is praise, and as the operation will certainly make no comment. As a result, some vendors focus on the design, such as the size of shapes, as well as the operation interface, if the image quality is not very good, the entire evaluation will be low, and the positioning of the camera, the individual is considered to be underestimated. The GX100 is a typical one.

Although the evaluation of my GX100, but the same, it was a very low rating on the GX100. Image quality is a main cause, because as long as the larger point, in fact, the consumer will have many advanced machines to choose from, the most well-known brand is the C of G is often used to compare series.

I can only say that when the players reach for an item requested by a certain extent, many ordinary people does not appear to be a very important detail, the fact will be very different watershed. As someone on the extreme requirements of image quality, it will find a good body, expensive lenses and large, do not care about a multi-body back.

And I are taking the development as long as the image quality is available under the premise of the smallest size that I pursued. Because I always feel that, do you really want, then image quality, and then out like a SLR. Therefore, the difference between the size of which is that I want the election to become the GX100 reasons, we are not going to the G Series C license.

When you ask a certain licenses and good who GX100, GX100, or where in the end, when good, in fact, do not suggest you buy this. Because of the ethnic groups targeted GX100 is very obvious that the volume-oriented, the volume is relatively high for the requirements of players. Usually ask a friend, for the volume of demand is in fact not so high, that is the price at the time, we have had much better choice. For each person a different photographic experience, not everyone will reach the size of the weight of high demand.

But in fact, this is just not happy with, select the most appropriate, after all, the image quality, focus speed also focus on the dark it is weak, especially in the tradition of the conversion to digital, the feelings of a very deep . But apart from this, the follow-up as the GX200, the individual is to achieve the perfect mind the requirements of recent, especially in the operation interface is used by most individuals Shun, of course, is a small point you regretted, for example, one switch In fact only about turning round a grid, rather than the form can be Shuttle.

Even now there LX3, personally think that, GX200 or his competitiveness.

Please click here to connect the next one